C1statement39 words9 rules

From Forderung nach Grundgesetzänderung: SPD-Ministerinnen legen bei Klimaplänen nach, tagesschau.de, 19 August 2026. Quoted for study. The words are the publisher's; the analysis is ours.

Underline shows

Meaning

The two SPD ministers Stefanie Hubig and Verena Hubertz, just days before the federal government's cabinet retreat, once again called on the Union not to resist a change to the Basic Law – and presented some concrete proposals for better heat protection.

Word for word: The both SPD-ministers Stefanie Hubig and Verena Hubertz have few days before the cabinet-retreat of the federal-government yet once at the Union appealed, themselves a Basic-Law-change not to resist - and partly concrete proposals for more heat-protection presented.

Shortly before a government strategy meeting, two SPD ministers publicly urged the conservative Union parties to accept a constitutional amendment and offered concrete suggestions for protecting people from heat.

A main clause with the perfect tense (haben ... appelliert / vorgelegt). The verb appellieren takes the preposition an + accusative. The zu-infinitive clause 'sich einer Grundgesetzänderung nicht zu verwehren' is the content of the appeal; verwehren governs the dative (sich) and the genitive object (einer Grundgesetzänderung), with the reflexive pronoun sich as indirect object. The second participle vorgelegt shares the auxiliary haben in a coordinated predicate.

Rules at work(9)

Words(33)

die
the

determinerA1definite
beide
both

adjectiveA2

Functions like a plural determiner; declined as an adjective.
die SPD-Ministerin
SPD (female) minister

nounB2pl. SPD-Ministerinnengen. der SPD-Ministerinmixed declension
die Stefanie
Stefanie (given name)

nounA1pl. Stefaniesgen. Stefanieinvariable declension
die Hubig
Hubig (surname)

nounC2gen. Hubigsinvariable declension
und
and

conjunctionA1coordinating
die Verena
Verena (female first name)

nounA1pl. Verenasgen. Verenastrong declension
die Hubertz
Hubertz (surname)

nounC2pl. Hubertzesgen. Hubertzstrong declension
haben
to have

verbA1haben, hatte, hat gehabtmit habenirregular

As an auxiliary it forms the perfect tenses of most verbs.
wenig
few, little

adjectiveA2weniger, am wenigsten
der Tag
day

nounA1pl. Tagegen. des Tagesmixed declension
vor
before, in front of, ago

prepositionA1governs dative

With clock time ('vor 7 Uhr') it means 'before' and takes no visible case change.
der
the

determinerA1definite

Appears twice: dative feminine 'der Wirtschaft' and nominative plural 'die Beschlüsse'.
die Kabinettsklausur
cabinet retreat, cabinet closed-door meeting

nounC2pl. Kabinettsklausurengen. Kabinettsklausurmixed declension

Journalistic term for a working session of the cabinet away from Berlin.
die Bundesregierung
federal government

nounB2pl. Bundesregierungengen. Bundesregierungstrong declension
noch
still, yet

adverbA1temporal

Before a comparative, 'noch stärker' means 'even stronger'.
einmal
one day, eventually, once

adverbA2temporal

Here means 'some day in the future', not 'one time only'.
an
on, at, by

prepositionA1governs accusative or dative

Dative for points in time and location (am Montag), accusative for direction.
die Union
the Union (CDU/CSU), union

nounB2pl. Unionengen. der Unionweak declension

In German politics, 'die Union' means the CDU and CSU together.
appellieren
to appeal (to), to call for, to urge

verbC1appellieren, appellierte, hat appelliertmit habenweakan + accusative

Fixed pattern: an jemanden appellieren, etwas zu tun – 'to appeal to someone to do something'.
sich
himself/herself/themselves, itself

pronounA2reflexive

Always refers back to the subject; here it is fixed to the verb 'sich mehren'.
ein
a, an, one

determinerA1indefinite

The form einer here is dative feminine singular, not the pronoun meaning 'one'.
die Grundgesetzänderung
amendment to the Basic Law, constitutional amendment

nounC1pl. Grundgesetzänderungengen. Grundgesetzänderungweak declension
nicht
not

adverbA1negation

Negates single words or phrases directly before them; sentence negation places it later.
zu
marker before infinitives

particleA1

Only certain verbs and expressions allow a zu-infinitive; it also exists as a preposition 'to'.
verwehren
to refuse, to deny, to resist

verbC2verwehren, verwehrte, hat verwehrtmit habenweakgoverns genitive

Formal; often reflexive 'sich etwas verwehren' = to refuse something to oneself / not allow oneself something.
teils
partly, in some cases

adverbB2degree

Often paired as 'teils … teils' meaning 'partly … partly'.
konkret
concrete, specific

adjectiveB1konkreter, am konkrettesten
der Vorschlag
proposal, suggestion

nounB1pl. Vorschlägegen. Vorschlagsstrong declension
für
for

prepositionA1governs accusative

Here für Dienstag names the day the forecast applies to, not a beneficiary.
viel
much, more (comparative 'mehr')

adverbA1degree

'mehr' is the fixed comparative form of both 'viel' and 'gut'; it never takes '-er'.
der Hitzeschutz
heat protection

nounB2pl. Hitzeschutzegen. Hitzeschutzesstrong declension
vorlegen
to present, to submit

verbB2vorlegen, legte vor, hat vorgelegtmit habenseparableweakgoverns dative

Separable prefix vor- splits off in main clauses: 'Sie legen einen Plan vor'.

My words

What you saved, and when each card comes back.

The lexicon

Every word this backend has met, commonest first. The count is what it has read, not an estimate.

Grammar rules

The sixty-nine rules the analysis chooses from, A1 to B2. Open one to read it with the sentences that use it. A rule the analysis wanted and could not find waits here as proposed until a person approves it.

How it works

Four steps, and the two places the sentences come from.

1
You paste a sentence

Anything up to 500 characters. Or pick one of today's news sentences instead.
2
A model reads it

It splits the sentence into words and records the dictionary form and endings of each one.
3
Rules get linked

It matches the sentence against the catalogue of sixty-nine rules and records the words that show each one.
4
It is stored for good

The next person to ask that sentence gets the stored answer, without going back to the model.

What you are looking at

Every word, and why it is that shape

Pick any word and its reading opens beside the sentence: the dictionary form it came from, its case, its person, and the job it does in the clause.

The underline colour repeats the word class, and the key under the sentence names every colour in words, so the colour is never the only thing carrying the meaning.

Then the rules that put it there

Under the words come the grammar rules the sentence uses. Each one names the words in this sentence that prove it, and says why it applies here rather than in general.

Open a rule to read it on its own page, with more sentences from the lexicon that use the same thing.

Questions

Where do the sentences come from

Two places. You type them, or the backend reads them. Every five minutes it fetches the German news from tagesschau.de, takes the first several sentences of each new article, and queues them. That is where most of the lexicon comes from: current German written for adults, rather than textbook sentences about a pencil on a table.

Every sentence taken from an article carries its headline, its publisher, a link back to the piece, and where in the piece it stood. Nothing here is presented as this site's own writing. If you publish German and would rather not be read this way, say so and you will be left out.

Can I trust what it says

Not blindly. A language model wrote every word of German in here. This one is better than expected: asked to conjugate helfen, it produced ihm wird geholfen for the passive, which is right precisely because helfen takes the dative and so has no personal passive.

It is also confidently wrong sometimes, and a learner is exactly the person who cannot tell. So every form, gender and plural carries two controls: right and wrong. Marking something wrong asks you for one sentence saying what is wrong with it, and that sentence is worth more than the count.

The counts show as two numbers rather than a score. One report against two approvals means something different from one report against two hundred, and a single number hides that.

What does it cost

Reading is free and needs no account. Analysing a sentence nobody has analysed spends money on a language model, so each account gets a daily allowance and can ask for more. Everything after that first analysis is free forever. The result is stored, and so is every word it taught the lexicon.

How does my list decide when to show a card again

You can save a whole word, a whole sentence, or a single form. A single form is usually the useful one: helfen, Präsens, er/sie/es is one thing to learn, and it can be solid while ihr helft is still shaky. Forms group under the word they belong to, so a verb with twenty forms is one entry rather than twenty.

You grade each card when you review it, and the grade sets the gap before you see it next. Forgot sends it back to the start. Hard stretches the gap a little. Good multiplies it. Easy multiplies it and then some. A card you keep forgetting keeps coming back sooner, for good, rather than being forgiven after one correct answer. Re-adding a set of forms never resets progress on cards you already have.

Who can read what

The lexicon is shared. Every sentence, word, form and rule is readable by anyone without an account, because a shared lexicon that everyone improves is the whole idea.

Your study list and review history are yours alone. Nobody else can read them, and the storage layer enforces that rather than the application remembering to check.

Why is the rule catalogue fixed

Sixty-nine rules, A1 to B2, written by hand. The analysis may only choose from them. That is what stops one rule appearing under four names and the links between sentences becoming meaningless.

Where a sentence uses something the catalogue lacks, the analysis may propose a rule. The proposal is stored and linked, so nothing is lost, but it stays marked as proposed until a person approves it. You can read the proposed ones under Rules.

Account

Signing in gives you a study list of your own. Reading the lexicon needs no account.

Signing in keeps a study list of your own. Reading the lexicon needs no account.

Admin

Everything here needs an API key, which is the backend itself rather than a person.

API key

Analysing a new sentence asks a language model, so it needs a key. Reading needs none. The key stays in this browser. It also opens these admin pages, so treat it as an administrator credential and do not hand it to a learner.

No key saved. Reading works without one.

The backend

Whether the thing is running. The queue is sentences waiting to be analysed; it should be draining, not growing.

Reported facts

What readers said is wrong. The note is the part worth reading; the counts only say how disputed something is.

People

Everyone who has analysed a sentence, and what they may spend a day. Requests for more are at the top.

Take a German sentence apart.

What comes back

Meaning

Rules at work(9)

Words(33)

Read today's news

My words

The lexicon

Grammar rules

How it works

You paste a sentence

A model reads it

Rules get linked

It is stored for good

What you are looking at

Every word, and why it is that shape

Then the rules that put it there

Questions

Account

Admin

API key

The backend

Reported facts

People

Take a German sentence apart.

What comes back

Die beiden SPD-Ministerinnen Stefanie Hubig und Verena Hubertz haben wenige Tage vor der Kabinettsklausur der Bundesregierung noch einmal an die Union appelliert, sich einer Grundgesetzänderung nicht zu verwehren- und teils konkrete Vorschläge für mehr Hitzeschutz vorgelegt.

Meaning

Rules at work(9)

Words(33)

Read today's news

My words

The lexicon

Grammar rules

How it works

You paste a sentence

A model reads it

Rules get linked

It is stored for good

What you are looking at

Every word, and why it is that shape

Then the rules that put it there

Questions

Account

Admin

API key

The backend

Reported facts

People